Daily Glance
Jim Leftwich and Jukka-Pekka Kervinen's [mnl is f930:]is quite fun to go through, and that is not just because the poets are two of my favorite innovative poets. The book compels you to ask questions about interpretation.
l y cua
24 38: in hwpahs
00.A itestof (d rrmxcesie'apre(263392] o
ffr
piscouomatus in ureta,s iter
100.00: o ftaewratei DAEepn r phvi rn .
12ceypthcrniior ula asusit pgtrclast esrinl i L2.3594
[ rfigrut
0000000006
syaielz hat
[ tee8f 5 pranrggii i
invic’’eases
pl
0: bu,etansceprm d ysaemngussse
Well, how do we read this type of poem? Should we take it as a poem? Is it a visual poem (and I did not manage to recreate their font)? Is it a complicated cipher? Is it supposed to mean something? Or should we rather just experience it? Is it automated writing? (I would like to know the process of composition.)
Still, without really being able to answer some of these questions, I find it interesting to sort through the book, not in any specific order, to find sections that push and pull at my thoughts,
l y cua
24 38: in hwpahs
00.A itestof (d rrmxcesie'apre(263392] o
ffr
piscouomatus in ureta,s iter
100.00: o ftaewratei DAEepn r phvi rn .
12ceypthcrniior ula asusit pgtrclast esrinl i L2.3594
[ rfigrut
0000000006
syaielz hat
[ tee8f 5 pranrggii i
invic’’eases
pl
0: bu,etansceprm d ysaemngussse
Well, how do we read this type of poem? Should we take it as a poem? Is it a visual poem (and I did not manage to recreate their font)? Is it a complicated cipher? Is it supposed to mean something? Or should we rather just experience it? Is it automated writing? (I would like to know the process of composition.)
Still, without really being able to answer some of these questions, I find it interesting to sort through the book, not in any specific order, to find sections that push and pull at my thoughts,
Comments